Changing Family Roles: Women No Longer Want the

There has been a drastic channelise in the definition of marriage ranging the then(prenominal) cubic decimeter years. Today much and more women be joining the workforce rather than staying home to take safekeeping of the children. It is evident that women have been get, so to say, the in short peculiarity of the stick, where in straight marriages with or without children (same sex marriages atomic number 18 being left out for arguments sake), the maintain is seen as what Steve Mitz in New Rules Postwar Families 1955-present commonly refers to the breadwinner father.This economizes responsibilities argon to take c argon of the financial aspects of the family plot of land the stay-at-home mommy(Mitz, 16) takes c are of the children, does all the wash, cleans the house, goes to the grocery store, takes little jimmy to the hospital, to school, to his soccer game, does the dishes, is the conserves secretary, all on circus tent of working full- while. The reason for thi s spacious list of responsibilities is to compare whether the preserves contributions to the family are equal to that of the wives. No, they are not equal.Women are not happy with having to go to work on top of cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children, while the conserves have the same responsibilities as before. It seems only median(a) to split the family responsibilities down the middle taking into considerateness general male muscular superiority. Some men have a preconceived notion, usually established from their parents, that women are supposed to cook and clean, and every(prenominal) night dinner should be on the table with the biggest piece of yellowed on the husbands plate.Well condemnations are ever-changing and it is time for the husband to start overlap the chicken(not literally). It is time for the husband to start sharing duties that now working mothers have on top of their stay-at-home mom responsibilities. Steve Mitz says it best when he replies, A merican Family life has undergone a historical transformation as radical as any that has interpreted place in the last 150 years. In the quotation higher up Mitz is implying that drastic changes are redefining grammatical gender roles in the like a shots marriages. In the fifties it was common practice that women stayed home and men worked.Today things are different, women are more educated disabling the husbands cap index to control their wives. Instead of a mutualistic marriage, men in the fifties use uneducated women, to put it point blank, as their buckle downs. It is apparent in todays changing society that women are reexamining their situations at home, they are realizing that they are not being treated fairly. Women are reexamining societal norms, increasing their grooming, and changing unjust laws making it abundantly clear that they are sick of getting the short end of the stick in their marriages.The saying the short end of the stick is used in this essay to mean th at wives are attribute down full time jobs on top of cooking, cleaning etc, while husbands are not pitching in helping with the stereotypical women duties i. e. , cooking, cleaning, laundry etc. Societal norms must constantly be reexamined and changed. For example, in the years of Frederick Douglas, an African American pioneer, it was an established norm that slaves were prohibited from learning to read. Douglas, who was curious, distinct that he would learn to read by tricking the white boys of the time into contend games that would teach him new words.Also, Douglas would try to read the notes his pass over would send with him on errands. Once Douglas learned to read, it changed his world, he envisiond that the white slave owners suppress him and his sight. Douglas became so upset over the fact that slavery was so astray accepted by his people that he fewtimes thought he would have been better off it he had never learned to read. Since the volume of slaves of the time co uldnt read, they were un cheating of their oppression, while Douglas realized his surroundings required to change.The point of this tangent story relates to how the husband of the fifties(fifties is used as a generalization for the past regarding the time frame Mitz talks roughly) is like the slave owner and the wife like the unknowing slave. Today women are like Douglas, but in a different time frame. Once they had the ability to see their situations in a different light, as Douglas did, they could do something about it. Societal norms of the fifties said that if men and women didnt marry, they are denigrated as sick, neurotic or immoral, and couples who did not have children were seem as selfish. (Mitz, 18).This indicates to the ratifier that the norms of marriage and children masked the true light of the wives oppressive lives. Through reexamination, people eventually realize that what was once suits society no longer accommodates some divisions within that society. If these e stablished norms exclude change, how can we as a people, allow alone a couple that has to share a life together, originate and change? The answer is we cant change unless norms are reexamined with change magnitude education and opportunity. Increased education and opportunities are big reasons women are realizing that they are getting the short end of the stick.Education, as it allowed Douglas to see his oppression, allows women to realize that they are involved in a marriage that is not fair to them. Today more and more women are getting college degrees. These degrees enable women to have a go at it inequalities within their marriages. Without education, wives are repressed individuals. Degrees can also change what wives secern as their deepest satisfactions. A mother of the fifties may have been meat with watching little jimmy grow up, which is satisfying in a different way, however, intellectual curiosity may spark a change in personal value.Do the majority of people with increased education, careless(predicate) of sex, want to work at McDonalds? Does the complexity of thought increase with education? In the fifties women passed on education(Mitz, 18) entering into marriage relying on a husband to take care of them. This reliance on the husband sets the wife up to be taken advantage of. Today women are more careful about entering in the deposit of set apart matrimony. Till death do you part is a long time where shifts in values can make that creed nearly impossible. world more critical before getting married can make it the couple and any future children headaches. Another reason why women in the past didnt go to college is because their parents only pressured the male children in the family to go to college. Males in the past also got more recognition for playing sports than their effeminate counterparts. Again, this is due to the fact that in the past young females would not admit to know how to kick a soccer ball, but rather to know how to s eparate whites from the darks when doing laundry.Young women in the past were almost predestined to get the traditionalist values of getting married and having children. Not only does increased education and opportunity reveal to women the inequalities within their marriages, but also the changes in unjust laws further show that society knows that women are getting the short end of the stick. According to the article New Rules Postwar Families 1955-present Mitzs gives the statistic that fifty percent of all court business involves domestic relations.This astounding statistic shows that women are fed up with getting the short end of the stick. Also in the same article, Mitz expresses how women are getting the short end of the stick de jure when he replies , Nineteenth century legal presumptions about the proper roles of husband and wife has also been called into question. Until recently, the law considered the husband to be head and master of his family his surname became his chi ldrens surname he was immune from lawsuits initiated by his wife, and he was entitled to sexualIn the quotation above, Mitz provides examples of the unjust laws regarding oppressed women. These laws catered to the husbands needs and not their wives. Mitz then says, Since the 1970s several state supreme courts have ruled that husbands and wives can sue each other, that the husband cannot give the children his surname without the wives permission, and that husbands can be prosecuted for raping This quotation shows that women are speaking out getting unjust laws changed. These laws, which we know to be morally wrong, are now being rewritten to fit the needs of todays wives.Laws from the past and future are going away to have to be constantly reexamined in order to continually fit the needs of our changing society. Finally, wives are going to continue to get the short end of the stick until husbands start to really help women with family responsibilities. Todays society is ever changin g and through education and reexamination of social norms and laws, the definition of gender roles are going to have to be redefined in order to break the family responsibilities in a fair and neutral manner.