Pro War in Iraq Essay -- War Wars Argumentative persuasive Essays

Pro War in IraqI do non subscribe to the fashionable notion of moral equivalence between all late-held beliefs. I believe in the rights of the individual oer the collective. I believe state is better than dictatorship, both morally and practically. non necessarily country as we or the Americans or the French practice session it, but the idea that in every possible practical way, you should let great deal make their own decisions, and if these decisions need to be circumscribed in any way, then you should only do it with the explicit approval of a majority of the people in question. And above all that a people must be able to change governments and leaders without resorting to force. So my ongoing position is that I am not comfortable with a population in which there be prosperous democracies and failing dictatorships, and we are suppose not to notice beca usance somehow it would be disrespectful of the people brio under the dictatorships. I jadet buy it.The puzzle, of c ourse, is that many peoples shortly living under dictatorships might, if asked right now, come up with some deeply unpleasant policy decisions. They might even vote against democracy, saying they dont want it. This is the worry in many countries with an Islamic fundamentalism problem if they can imbibe a majority the fundamentalists are committed to democracy under the slogan one man, one vote, just this once. That is not democracy.Democracy needs certain conditions to get started. It is an eco-system, not a individual tree, you cant just plant it and sit back in its shade. But once it is established, it is hard to uproot. People talk about democracy needing a democratic culture, but culture is the wrong word, it makes it laborious subjective. What it really needs is a universal foundation based on respect for the individual freedom of speech, freedom of association, primacy of the rule of law, relinquishing the use of political violence, the rights of women to participate fully in economic, social and political life. It may be the case that these values are most clearly held in Northern Europe, North America and the English-speaking world. But they are not western values they are all founded in the primacy of the rights of the individual. Where these values read had a chance to become established in other cultures, they transfer root. Southern and Eastern Europe, Japan a... ... under any circumstances, is unequivocal.Apart from the overt point that all UN members are always selective about which resolutions they get involved in implementing, it is worth reading Resolution 242 itself. Sure enough, it requires coitus interruptus of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict. At the same time, however, it requires Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and realisation of the sovereignty, territorial peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force. The State referre d to in the second part is, of course, Israel the claims, threats, territorial incursions and violence are those visited on it by its neighbors since its creation and acknowledgement by the UN. The resolutions against Saddam ibn Talal Hussein were unilateral and unequivocal. They are materially different from resolutions that present a sheaf of requirements that have to be carried out by both sides in a conflict, and whose implementation is going to require the cooperation of both sides.And there you have it. I think the intervention is morally justified, practically required, and legally based.