Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Stereotyping and Its Effects
Stereotyping, brought on by the  human beings of a class system, has  many an(prenominal) positive  do in  stool Steinbecks Grapes of Wrath. This class system, made up of migrators and affluent people, is present  collectable to the fact that many of the affluent people  stereotype the migrants as poor, uneducated, and  comfortably agitated human beings. Thus, this sets a boundary between the educated individuals and migrants. At first, most migrants ignore the effects stereotyping has on them. But towards the end of their journeys to California, the migrants  vexation that had been gradually building up inside lets out and the migrants take action. The effects  atomic number 18 more positive as the migrants strive for an education,  find out sympathy, and  calmly  speak with conflicts.Farm owners, successful businessmen, and generally all inhabitants of the Mid-West  take a shit a sense that all migrants are dumb, uneducated people in 1939. They  pull down wages for fruit-picking at    farms which were the  single jobs offered to the migrants because of their proposed lack of intelligence. But migrants do not necessarily choose not to educate themselves. Ma Joad announces to her family that she will  head her two youngest children to school once they are settled. Connie, Rose of Sharons husband,  as well plans out his goals with Rose of Sharon saying, An hes Connie gonna study at home,  perchance radio, so he can git to be an expert . . .  The migrants have their mind already set on education and chose not to be ignorant all of their lives.Often in Grapes of Wrath, the affluent people stereotype the migrants as poor and penniless(prenominal). As the Joads pull into the gas station, the attendant  presently asks, Got any money? He  surveys the Joads as one of many poor, migrant families arriving to beg for some gas. But not all people who view migrants as poverty-stricken, hungry people see them in such a way. Mae, a waitress at one of the restaurants pities a fam   ily asking for  prick and shows her compassion by letting the children have candy for much less than its worth. Instead of the anticipated let-down, the migrants receive pity from those with compassion and sympathy.Not only do affluent individuals see the migrants as uneducated and penniless, but  excessively as easily agitated human beings. Because farm workers are  cowardly that these migrants may someday take over their farms, they try to make the migrants  pillow more unwelcoming. Now if there was a big  conjure and  possibly shooting-a bunch of deputies could go in and clean out the camp, one of the owners says to  tomcat and the Wallaces.Farm owners even plan to start a fight, thinking that no migrant can pass up a fight. But the migrants deal with the problem in a calm manner with no fight ever beginning. Cops swarm all over to provoke migrants so that many can be arrested and pulled off the streets. But the migrants resolve their problems so that  red-hot problems do not sta   rt. To farm owners, provoking migrants is a way to  hold more migrants from stealing their land and resources but ends unsuccessfully.Stereotyping, brought on by the  humanity of a class system, has many positive effects in Grapes of Wrath. The migrants do intend to acquire an education, receive sympathy from the compassionate, and react intelligently to  enticing situations. Steinbeck portrays society in its truest form. Even with the negative influence of the affluent people, the migrants receive just as many positive results as there are negative under such harsh circumstances.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment