The Prince Essay -- Essays Papers

The PrinceThe Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli provides an analysis on how to govern and maintain king in a principality. In the jump five chapters, he defines the three ways a monarch shtup acquire his dominion either he inherits it, whether he creates a hot one, or annexes territories, and further discusses how to govern them. Machiavelli states that hereditary principalities are less gnarly than the mixed ones since newly acquired dominion tend to be more rebellious. The dominion must therefore colonize them and allow citizen to keep their laws or blow out the governmental structure. In order to illustrate his point, he analyses the success of horse parsley the Great conquest in Iran. He then considers five attainable ways to acquire power and become a prince (Ch. VI-XI). First, a individual(a) citizen back become a ruler due to his own qualities or virtues, like Cyrus or Romulus. A second way to become a ruler is through others power or favor. wherefore a man lik e Cesare Borgia gained power due to his father support, alone lost it when the latter died. For Machiavelli, getting power so quickly can be dangerous since the new monarch might lack noesis on how to govern. In the third case, he uses the exemplification of Agathocles of Sicily to illustrate power gained through murders. In his opinion, the conqueror must decide if his crimes will help oneself him establish power and then commit them all at at a time so that he can later reestablish the confidence of his subjects. The fourthly method is called civil principality, people basically choose the ruler, and this enables him to maintain power. The break down possibility is to be elected pope and Machiavelli provides a brief overview of the apparitional order. Next, he explores (Ch. XII- XIV) which arms are best to defend a principality and states that a ruler can chose to use his own, or mercenaries, or auxiliaries or a mixture of all three. From Chapter XV throughout Chapt er XIX, Machiavelli proposes to describe how a prince should behave and tells the truth about surviving as a monarch, instead than recommending moral ideals. He describes the virtues commonly assimilated with a prince and concludes that some virtues will transmit to a princes destruction, whereas some vices will enable him to survive. He describes the advantages of being benevolent or greedy, merciful or severe, deceitful or honest. Machiavelli... ...d not jump out from bad consequences on the long run. On the other hand, the Exxon-Valdez oil-spill case is an example of deceptive PR. Indeed, not much was done for the Alaskan community and the breadbasket ended up being perceived in a in truth negative way by the general public. These two crisis communication cases fork up that people and mechanisms of power have things in common with Machiavellis times, just now society has become less tolerant of evil strategies. Rulers or corporations stillness have the means to dece ive, but people are no womb-to-tomb subject to an authority considered divine. Therefore, the ones who govern are exposed to feedback and can only avoid the consequences of their acts. A counter example, of course, would be the one of President Clinton as he voluntarily lied in court about his congress with Monica Lewinsky. He put on the face of virtue to deceive his citizens and in so doing manipulated the perception they had of him. In fact, Clintons communication specialists probably informed him to use this strategy, which follow the Machiavellian precepts. Although power might not on the button be the same anymore, principles on human natures are constant throughout time.