Responsibility to Protect Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Responsibility to Protect - Case Study congresswomanTherefore, the power of the international community has proved impotent while thousands suffer. In September of 2005, the human being leaders assembled at the U.N. The largest such gathering of heads of state in history produced the responsibility to protect document in which 150 signatures were attached. The nations of the world agreed to publication collective action, in a timely and decisive manner, through the Security Council, in accordance with the UN Charter on a case by case basis and in cooperation with pertinent organizations as appropriate, should peaceful means be inadequate (Rasul, 2005). Since the end of World War II and the Nazis executing of the final solution, the phrase, never again has echoed throughout the world, besides genocide has occurred over and over again. The responsibility to protect is an agreement late in coming. It has not curbed the violence in Darfur and its complex implications drive not ex isted without continued debate and controversy. The U.S., in contrive with all nations of the U.N., is compelled by reasons of human compassion to protect any group from genocide. We are our brothers keeper. We all have the responsibility to protect and book the people of Darfur.The Responsibility to Protect provides that a country cannot refuse assistance or support from other countries when it cannot or will not safeguard its citizens from genocide or other actions deemed as a crime against humanity. All nations sovereignty is respected as is their ability to conduct their own affairs but this is a qualified condition, not one that is considered absolute. When peaceful means are exhausted and leaders of a UN member state are manifestly failing to protect their populations, then other states have the responsibility to take collective action through the Security Council (ONeill, 2006). In some respects, the concept of Responsibility to Protect was founded in the common tint for h uman rights worldwide, the concept that initiated the formation of the U.N. The Genocide Treaty (1948) and the Universal Declaration of homophile Rights (1948) are manifestations of the U.N.s founding principles. In the 1960s, the international human rights covenants furthered this philosophical stance of the U.N. However, these treaties, covenants and resolutions were not effectively enforced. affected countries argued that their right to national sovereignty superseded the intentions of uninvited intrusion. For many years, the U.N. and others have debated the subject of humanitarian intervention depicted object regarding the question of when the nations of the world should unite to take military action against a country so as to protect that countrys population. Supporters of the responsibility to protect and humanitarian intervention concepts include liberal-minded persons worldwide who encourage the use of military forces to come to the aid of horrific people (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, 2001). However, the questions surrounding the use of force has been of great concern to many especially following the recent humanitarian efforts