.

Friday, May 3, 2019

Scientific literacy questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Scientific literacy questions - Essay ExampleKepler developed the laws of planetary motion in 1605 CE. The laws state that the scene of action of every planet is an ellipse around the Sun. In 1610 CE, Galileo published the first scientific treatise based on observations made through a telescope. When he publicly supported heliocentrism, he met with clerical opposition from the papistical Catholic Church. Galileo was warned to abandon his support for a Sun-centered cosmology, but. he later defended his views, he was tried by the Inquisition, obligate to recant and spend the rest of his life under house arrest. Today, we accept that neither the sun nor the undercoat is the center of the Universe. The motivations of empiricists vary with the gestalt of their time. The earliest astronomers were in fact astrologers. People believed divination of the future was possible from the acquire of the motions of heavenly bodies. Philosophers have often viewed astrophysics as a corporeal metho d of simply understanding somatic reality and our place in the cosmos. Physical scientists sought answers to pressing questions based interpretations of observable data. This path from natural to objective knowledge raises an interesting question for our egos.In 1961, Frank Drake formulated a method of estimating the likeliness of extraterrestrial life (PBS). The Drake equation states N = R* fp ne f fi fc L where, N is the arrive of civilizations in our coltsfoot, with which communication might be possible, andCurrent estimates of the values of the variables follow. Where, R* = 7/year, fp = 0.5, ne = 2, fl = 0.33, fi = 0.01, fc = 0.01, and L = 10,000 years N = 7 0.5 2 0.33 0.01 0.01 10,000 = 2.1. Thus, two communicative civilizations probably exist in our galaxy at any given time, on average. Furthermore, there may be up to two century more that are not trying to communicate, and there are billions of galaxies like ours. Based on this reasoning, it seems double-faced to believe we are perfectly unique in

No comments:

Post a Comment