Just War Essay

Current unconstipatedts all over the nut raise questions with respect to the propriety and deterrent examples of waging by one country to a nonher. For example, at that place ar some take downts that force state to think, rationalize, and make a distinction surrounded by cont stop over in its traditional fantasy and a war against terrorism, which makes it crucial for a state to obtain information from captured terrorists in a short period of era (Moseley). There ar international standards and agreements that notice the rules with respect to the waging of war, specifically applied in determining whether the war net incomed is and or not (Williams, Jr.and Caldwell).For one, there is the Geneva Convention, which deals with the dread objective of protecting Prisoners of fight (POW) from various(a) abuses (Moseley). The most popular surmisal traffic with the ethics, ethics, or propriety of waging war is the just war theory (Moseley Williams, Jr. and Caldwell). Thi s theory refers to justice in war, or moral support for war (Moseley). merely war theory has two aspects the theoretical and the historic tradition (Moseley Williams, Jr. and Caldwell).In the former, the apology and reasons behind war are discussed tour in the latter, the focus of attention revolves rough the body of rules and agreements entered into by international bodies that are supposed to be applied in times of war (Moseley). The former is withal known as jus ad bellum, composition the latter is also known as jus in bello (Moseley). Both concepts are not mutually exclusive, and both deal with the morality of conduct and the decision to go into war (Moseley). These concepts have a long account of tradition that built the rules of conduct to be observed during war (Moseley).The concept of jus in bello had been formulated due to decades, or even centuries of experience (Moseley). Thus, it must be deemed applicable, even to modern types of war experienced by the world today, like the war against terrorism. Indeed, the war against terrorism is of a different merciful from the other kinds of wars that human racekind had seen (Schwartz). However, the differences, such as the alleged pressing need for information, are not enough to abandon standards that are designed to protect the dignity of the human person (Schwartz).One of the criteria of jus in bello is rigid proportion of the conduct with the objective coveted (Moseley). Applying this criterion to any proposal to wage war against a country or group of people, there would ultimately be the question of whether the use of force, that would necessarily end in the loss of thousands, if not millions of lives, would loose the achievement of various goals, such as freedom, economic independence, or national pledge (Schwartz).Works CitedMoseley, Alexander. Just War Theory. 2006. 10 Oct. 2007. <http//www. iep. utm. edu/j/justwar. htm>. Schwartz, Joseph M. Misreading Islamist Terrorism The War Against Terrorism and Just-War Theory. Metaphilosophy 35(2004) 273-302. Williams, Jr. , Robert E. and Dan Caldwell. Jus Post Bellum Just War Theory and the Principles of Just Peace. foreign Studies Perspectives 7(2006) 309-320